Appearance
Elie Mystal argues that Chief Justice John Roberts’s public statement dismissing impeachment as a remedy for judicial disagreement is historically hollow and strategically protective of institutional power. He frames Roberts’s stance as an attempt to shield the judiciary from accountability while avoiding confrontation with Trump’s attacks on federal judges. Mystal connects Roberts’s posture to early constitutional power struggles, suggesting that the Chief Justice is prioritizing the Court’s authority over meaningful checks on executive overreach.
Read the full article on The Nation
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) - Samuel Alito
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) - Clarence Thomas
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) — Thomas Concurrence - Clarence Thomas
Haaland v. Brackeen (2023) — Thomas Dissent - Clarence Thomas
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard/UNC (2023) — Thomas Concurrence - Clarence Thomas
Biden v. Nebraska (2023) — Thomas Concurrence - Clarence Thomas
Gonzales v. Carhart (2007) — Thomas Concurrence - Clarence Thomas
McDonald v. Chicago (2010) — Thomas Concurrence - Clarence Thomas
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) — Majority Vote - Amy Coney Barrett
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (2021) — Barrett Concurrence - Amy Coney Barrett
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard/UNC (2023) — Majority Vote - Amy Coney Barrett
Biden v. Nebraska (2023) — Majority Vote - Amy Coney Barrett
Shadow Docket Emergency Orders (2020–2024) - Amy Coney Barrett
COVID-19 Religious Gathering Cases (2020–2021) - Amy Coney Barrett
Impeachment Grounds for Judge Aileen Cannon: